<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rate hike | Solar Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solarforward.com/category/rate-hike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solarforward.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Utility Customers Outraged Over Possible Fee To Cope With Revenue Loss From Popular Solar Panels</title>
		<link>http://solarforward.com/utility-customers-outraged-over-possible-fee-to-cope-with-revenue-loss-from-popular-solar-panels/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photovoltaic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate hike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa monica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel installer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Santa Monica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solarforward.com/?p=406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The relationship between some utility companies and solar customers has gone from lukewarm to downright hostile. A state bill is working its way through the Legislature that would charge customers (not just solar customers) with a $10/month fee to make up for revenue losses utility companies have experienced due to the rising popularity of solar [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relationship between some utility companies and solar customers has gone from lukewarm to downright hostile.</p>
<p><a href="http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/08/21/utility-customers-outraged-over-possible-fee-to-cope-with-revenue-loss-from-popular-solar-panels/">A state bill is working its way through the Legislature</a> that would charge customers (not just solar customers) with a $10/month fee to make up for revenue losses utility companies have experienced due to the rising popularity of solar panels.</p>
<p>We at Solar Forward think this another blunder by the utility industry.  Solar saves everyone money and reduces the need for power plants and transmission lines.   Solar energy is generated where it is consumed, saving 10% on normal loss in wires and transformers.</p>
<p>This fee would apply to customers within Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas &amp; Electric and San Diego Gas &amp; Electric territories.</p>
<p>Consumer groups produced the video below, prompting Southern California Edison to issue a cease and desist letter.</p>
<p><iframe width="1080" height="608" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8ZeYOtEMTIA?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Now customers are making their voices heard by rallying outside Edison&#8217;s offices in Rosemead and expressing their outrage at utility companies creating even more roadblocks for clean, renewable energy.</p>
<p>At Solar Forward, we will do everything in our power to make sure the bill does not become law so California residents can continue to choose solar energy for their homes and businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>LA City Council Set to Approve DWP Rate Hike</title>
		<link>http://solarforward.com/la-city-council-set-to-approve-dwp-rate-hike/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[LA City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LADWP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LADWP rate increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate hike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel installer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunPower]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solarforward.com/la-city-council-set-to-approve-dwp-rate-hike/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They’re at it again.  LADWP is raising electricity rates 11.1% over the next two years, unless the LA City Council votes against the hikes, which they won’t. After internal LADWP approval, endorsement from the LADWP Rate Payer Advocacy Group, and now tentative backing from the LA City Council before a second vote next week, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They’re at it again.  LADWP is raising electricity rates 11.1% over the next two years, unless the LA City Council votes against the hikes, which they won’t.</p>
<p>After internal LADWP approval, endorsement from the LADWP Rate Payer Advocacy Group, and now tentative backing from the LA City Council before a second vote next week, the increase appears destined to hit our pocketbooks.</p>
<p>What might be the reason behind the rise? To bloat the salaries of utility employees?  No.  Well, at least not directly.  More on that later…</p>
<p>A LADWP issued <a href="http://www.ladwpnews.com/go/doc/1475/1542123/Board-of-Water-and-Power-Commissioners-Approves-2-Year-Electric-Rate-Increase" target="_blank">press release</a> from September 12, 2012 states:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>“The Los Angeles Board of Water and Power Commissioners moved forward today with a proposed 2-year electric rate change to pay to pay for investments needed to comply with legal mandates that are driving a complete transformation of LADWP’s power supply, to invest in replacing rapidly aging infrastructure to maintain reliability and expand customer opportunities through additional investment in money-saving energy efficiency programs which also comply with state requirements.”</i></p></blockquote>
<div></div>
<div>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="border: 0px;" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LGV3Fr1On4Y/UGORPQl0TfI/AAAAAAAAAGU/Mt1ho7nmqq8/s320/Black+panel+close-up.jpg" width="320" height="171" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Solar Forward crew installs SunPower Panels on a tile roof</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-48"></span></p>
<p>Whether we continue charging our lives off finite fossil fuels, or invest in pricier renewable energy (which thankfully we are shifting towards), the fact is our energy expenses will and must rise.  Here in California, electricity rates are rising at an average of <a href="http://www.solarsantamonica.com/financing.html#Intro" target="_blank">6%</a> each year.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s more.  According to a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dwp-rate-hikes-20120926,0,5549853.story" target="_blank">LA Times article</a>, “Independent ratepayer advocate Fred Pickel told the council that the DWP&#8217;s financial plan called for possible increases of 7.8% in 2014, 7.6% in 2015 and 6% in 2016.”</p>
<p>Yes, it’s a drag.  No, we can’t change it.*</p>
<p>Still, LADWP’s publicity battle would have been easier had it not just been revealed that their staff are paid approximately 26% &#8211; 46% more than workers at other utilities.  While levelheaded Angelinos may accept higher energy costs during an economic downturn, it’s a bit hard to swallow in light of these generous salaries.</p>
<p>*Here’s the secret: you <i>can</i> avoid utility inflation.  Go solar.  Produce your own energy by purchasing a solar system, with an average ROI of 7-9 years.  After that, your electricity is free.  Or, lease a solar system for no money upfront, paying only a low monthly payment for the next 20 years.  Zero-percent interest.  No catch.  Contact Solar Forward for a free estimate, <a href="http://www.solarforward.com/">www.solarforward.com</a>.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
