<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LA Times | Solar Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solarforward.com/category/la-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solarforward.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:41:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Shutting Down Nuclear, Powering Up Solar</title>
		<link>http://solarforward.com/shutting-down-nuclear-powering-up-solar/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photovoltaic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar rebate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solarforward.com/?p=394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The mistake of trying to fix fifty year old nuclear technology is going to cost us over $2 billion. That is enough to pay for over 100,000 home solar systems or rebates for 1,000,000 homes that enable a five year break even point. That is more power than San Onofre ever produced in a year. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mistake of trying to <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-07-14-san-onofre-tic-toc-20130714,0,5736015.story?page=1">fix fifty year old nuclear technology</a> is going to cost us over $2 billion. That is enough to pay for over 100,000 home solar systems or rebates for 1,000,000 homes that enable a five year break even point. That is more power than San Onofre ever produced in a year.</p>
<p>Nuclear power is toxic forever, a national security risk, and inefficient.  As with any centralized power source, more than 10% of the power produced is lost in the transmission lines before it gets to our homes.</p>
<div id="attachment_395" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://64.50.172.38/~solarfor/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/DSC_2978.jpg" data-rel="lightbox-image-0" data-rl_title="" data-rl_caption="" title=""><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-395" class="size-medium wp-image-395" alt="Residential solar power plant" src="http://64.50.172.38/~solarfor/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/DSC_2978-300x199.jpg" width="300" height="199" srcset="http://solarforward.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/DSC_2978-300x199.jpg 300w, http://solarforward.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/DSC_2978-1024x680.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-395" class="wp-caption-text">Residential solar power plant</p></div>
<p>Solar on your roof is safe, clean, nontoxic, and decentralized.  The power you produce on your home is consumed on site or next door.  There is no transmission loss.  There is no risk to the Earth and no risk of terrorism or nuclear meltdown.  Solar power maintenance is simple, without risk of radiation, cancer or contaminating thousands of square miles.</p>
<p>Beware the atom, embrace the sun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>LA City Council Set to Approve DWP Rate Hike</title>
		<link>http://solarforward.com/la-city-council-set-to-approve-dwp-rate-hike/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[LA City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LADWP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LADWP rate increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate hike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel installer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunPower]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solarforward.com/la-city-council-set-to-approve-dwp-rate-hike/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They’re at it again.  LADWP is raising electricity rates 11.1% over the next two years, unless the LA City Council votes against the hikes, which they won’t. After internal LADWP approval, endorsement from the LADWP Rate Payer Advocacy Group, and now tentative backing from the LA City Council before a second vote next week, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They’re at it again.  LADWP is raising electricity rates 11.1% over the next two years, unless the LA City Council votes against the hikes, which they won’t.</p>
<p>After internal LADWP approval, endorsement from the LADWP Rate Payer Advocacy Group, and now tentative backing from the LA City Council before a second vote next week, the increase appears destined to hit our pocketbooks.</p>
<p>What might be the reason behind the rise? To bloat the salaries of utility employees?  No.  Well, at least not directly.  More on that later…</p>
<p>A LADWP issued <a href="http://www.ladwpnews.com/go/doc/1475/1542123/Board-of-Water-and-Power-Commissioners-Approves-2-Year-Electric-Rate-Increase" target="_blank">press release</a> from September 12, 2012 states:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>“The Los Angeles Board of Water and Power Commissioners moved forward today with a proposed 2-year electric rate change to pay to pay for investments needed to comply with legal mandates that are driving a complete transformation of LADWP’s power supply, to invest in replacing rapidly aging infrastructure to maintain reliability and expand customer opportunities through additional investment in money-saving energy efficiency programs which also comply with state requirements.”</i></p></blockquote>
<div></div>
<div>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="border: 0px;" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LGV3Fr1On4Y/UGORPQl0TfI/AAAAAAAAAGU/Mt1ho7nmqq8/s320/Black+panel+close-up.jpg" width="320" height="171" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Solar Forward crew installs SunPower Panels on a tile roof</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-48"></span></p>
<p>Whether we continue charging our lives off finite fossil fuels, or invest in pricier renewable energy (which thankfully we are shifting towards), the fact is our energy expenses will and must rise.  Here in California, electricity rates are rising at an average of <a href="http://www.solarsantamonica.com/financing.html#Intro" target="_blank">6%</a> each year.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s more.  According to a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dwp-rate-hikes-20120926,0,5549853.story" target="_blank">LA Times article</a>, “Independent ratepayer advocate Fred Pickel told the council that the DWP&#8217;s financial plan called for possible increases of 7.8% in 2014, 7.6% in 2015 and 6% in 2016.”</p>
<p>Yes, it’s a drag.  No, we can’t change it.*</p>
<p>Still, LADWP’s publicity battle would have been easier had it not just been revealed that their staff are paid approximately 26% &#8211; 46% more than workers at other utilities.  While levelheaded Angelinos may accept higher energy costs during an economic downturn, it’s a bit hard to swallow in light of these generous salaries.</p>
<p>*Here’s the secret: you <i>can</i> avoid utility inflation.  Go solar.  Produce your own energy by purchasing a solar system, with an average ROI of 7-9 years.  After that, your electricity is free.  Or, lease a solar system for no money upfront, paying only a low monthly payment for the next 20 years.  Zero-percent interest.  No catch.  Contact Solar Forward for a free estimate, <a href="http://www.solarforward.com/">www.solarforward.com</a>.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
